What this rejection means
App Review thinks the app repeats something already on the App Store: the same template, concept or code as other apps, or one more app in a crowded category such as flashlights, fortune telling or dating. Apps built from a builder’s default template, and generic AI-chat apps, often land here.
Why reviewers send it
Apple keeps the App Store from filling up with near-identical apps. Reviewers compare the binary, the metadata and the concept with apps already submitted, so template-built apps and close copies of other apps get flagged — and so do developers who publish many similar apps instead of one.
The message App Review sends
Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam
We noticed your app shares a similar binary, metadata, and/or concept as apps previously submitted by a terminated Apple Developer Program account.The exact wording changes from one review to the next; the guideline number is what to look for.
How to fix it
- Make the app clearly yours: a specific audience, your own content, and a design that isn’t the builder’s default template.
- Remove template leftovers: placeholder text, sample data, stock screens and default icons.
- If you publish several similar apps, merge them into one app with the variations inside — Apple asks for exactly that.
- Reply with who the app is for and what it does that similar apps don’t. A reply alone rarely works if the app hasn’t changed.
Before you resubmit, run the Guideline 4.2 self-audit: six questions on what reviewers look for in a wrapped web app.
Fix it with Lovable, Bolt or Cursor
If the app was built with an AI builder, paste this into it, then check the result on a phone:
Remove every placeholder, sample-data and template screen, and give the app its own visual identity and real content for [our audience].What to reply in App Store Connect
Replace the [brackets] with what you actually changed:
Guideline 4.3 — [App name] is built for [specific audience] and does [what makes it different] that general [category] apps don’t. Since the last submission we have [replaced the template screens, added our own content, redesigned the interface]. We don’t publish other versions of this app.Got a different message?
Paste the whole rejection into the rejection explainer. It recognises this one and 26 others, in your browser — nothing is uploaded.
Other App Store rejections
- Guideline 4.2 Minimum Functionality rejection
- Guideline 2.1 App Completeness rejection
- Guideline 2.1 Information Needed: demo account
- Guideline 4.0 Design rejection: sign-in in Safari
- Guideline 2.3.3 Accurate Metadata: screenshots
- Guideline 2.3.10: Android mentioned in the app
- Guideline 2.3.8: app icon or name doesn’t match
- Guideline 4.8 Login Services: Sign in with Apple
- Guideline 5.1.1(v): account deletion required
- Guideline 5.1.1: permission purpose string
- Guideline 5.1.1: sign-up required to use the app
- Guideline 5.1.1(i): privacy policy link missing
- Guideline 5.1.2: App Tracking Transparency
- Guideline 3.1.1: digital goods without In-App Purchase
- Guideline 3.1.2: subscription information missing
- Guideline 1.5: support URL doesn’t work
